ObamaLaw – coming to a police department near you! – Wrapping it up

This is the final part of my analysis of the Interim Report filed by the President’s Task Force on 21st Century Policing (a). This blog post is going to analyze the “Implementation” section of the report and then I’m going to wrap all of this up in a nice, neat, little package of truth and top it off with a bow of reality. Liberals and Obama-llama ding dongs are not going to like it. Tough crap. As a fellow patriot keeps reminding me, we’re way past the point of sugar-coating things.

Quick recap….the Task Force was created last December by way of Obama’s ‘pen and phone’ in direct response to the unrest in Ferguson. If you have read any of the other blog posts (b) you know that my biggest gripe with this whole issue is that they’re trying to fix something that isn’t broken while ignoring the real issue. Our police departments don’t need to be reformed – as evidenced by the fact that Officer Darren Wilson was acquitted of any wrong-doing and even Holder’s DOJ couldn’t find grounds on which to indict him. However, some populations today have a glaringly obvious and open contempt for authority and place no value on life or property. This population is what needs to be fixed, not the police departments trying desperately to deal with it. That makes the Interim Report complete and total bullshit except in use as liberal propaganda.

‘Implementation’…..

7.1 RECOMMENDATION: The President should direct all federal law enforcement agencies to review the recommendations made by the Task Force on 21st Century Policing and, to the extent practicable, to adopt those that can be implemented at the federal level.

Federal law enforcement agencies? Most of the recommendations in this report were aimed at local law enforcement agencies…so does that mean that local is soon to be federal?

7.2 RECOMMENDATION: The U.S. Department of Justice should explore public-private partnership opportunities, starting by convening a meeting with local, regional, and national foundations to discuss the proposals for reform described in this report and seeking their engagement and support in advancing implementation of these recommendations.

I wonder if this would be done in much the same way that Pearson was used to implement Common Core into the education system. For those of you who may not have done the research, Pearson develops the curriculum and the tests that are now “mandatory” in public schools. If you look at Pearson’s political donations over the last several years, you’ll find that the Democratic Party and individual Democratic party members have received sizable sums of money from Pearson and its employees.

7.3 RECOMMENDATION: The U.S. Department of Justice should charge its Office of Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS Office) with assisting the law enforcement field in addressing current and future challenges.

Translation: We don’t like how law enforcement is being handled at the local level so the federal government is going to help…or takeover.

In support of this translation, look at some of the bullet items listed underneath Recommendation 7.3….

  • Create a National Policing Practices and Accountability Division within the COPS Office.
  • Establish national benchmarks and best practices for federal, state, local, and tribal police departments.
  • Provide technical assistance and funding to national, state, local, and tribal accreditation bodies that evaluate policing practices.
  • Provide technical assistance and funding to state training boards to help them meet national benchmarks and best practices in training methodologies and content.
  • Prioritize grant funding to departments meeting benchmarks.
  • Support departments through an expansion of the COPS Office Collaborative Reform Initiative.
  • Work with the U.S. Department of Homeland Security to ensure that community policing tactics in state, local, and tribal law enforcement agencies are incorporated into their role in homeland security.

Create a national policing division….establish national standards…..prioritize grant funding to departments that comply with national standards…..support departments through expansion of government reform….incorporate homeland security into local law enforcement. Folks, if you were reading this without any other context you would think that you were reading a report about Nazi Germany. Speaking of which…..

About the time I hit “pillar” five I was beginning to wonder if the path that Obama has put us on with our police departments is in any way similar to the path that the Nazis took in gaining control over Germany. It’s common knowledge to anyone who has studied history that the Nazi party was welcomed in on their foundation of “change” since the country’s job markets and economy had been in such dire straits for so long. I began doing research – using only reputable sources, of course. I was a little hesitant at first because I’m as tired as the Democrats are of hearing the “Obama is another Hitler” rhetoric. I didn’t want to add to that, but at the same time I was desperate to know whether history is in the process of repeating itself.

Let the history lesson begin….

Germany in 1914 may as well have been the United States of two decades ago. Germany had a gold-backed currency; was expanding their world leadership in optics, chemicals, and machinery; and the German Mark was equal in value to the British shilling, the French franc, and the Italian lira (c). In 1919, after a brutal defeat in WWI, Germany was forced to make reparations following the signing of the Versailles Treaty. These reparations, coupled with the collapse of Germany’s over inflated economy, resulted in disaster for many German citizens. By 1923 Germany’s economy had crashed such that the previous ratio of four or five Marks to each American dollar became one trillion Marks to each American dollar. Does this over-inflation followed by a catastrophic crash sound familiar? Like maybe the housing market crash in 2012? The similarities don’t end there. Read this paragraph from PBS and tell me if this doesn’t sound like you…or most of America.

Ordinary citizens worked at their jobs, sent their children to school and worried about their grades, maneuvered for promotions and rejoiced when they got them, and generally expected things to get better. But the prices that had doubled from 1914 to 1919 doubled again during just five months in 1922. Milk went from 7 Marks per liter to 16; beer from 5.6 to 18. There were complaints about the high cost of living. Professors and civil servants complained of getting squeezed. Factory workers pressed for wage increases. An underground economy developed, aided by a desire to beat the tax collector.

Have many Americans not already done this by taking jobs that pay “under the table”? Or scouring every IRS law to find the loophole that will let them out of paying taxes? Back to the history lesson…

As a result of the very unstable state of the nation, a new political party was founded in 1918 – the German Worker’s Party (d). The platform of the German Worker’s Party was very simple – build a strong nationalist, pro-military, party made up of working class people (e). The party was contemptuous of democracy and stressed racial theories. This political view very closely matched Hitler’s, so Hitler joined. In 1920 the party changed its name to the National Socialists German Worker’s Party (d).

Okay, is this party starting to sound like another political party we’re familiar with? It’s nationalistic in that it thinks it’s better than other parties and other governments. It’s contemptuous of democracy and has violated our country’s Constitution repeatedly – even flaunting their disregard of it in news stories (like when Obama said he did not need Congressional approval to declare war). And it stresses racial theories. Yes, it may claim that it wants equal rights for all races, but it’s fighting for rights of one specific race by taking them away from another. It creates bias and prejudice where there is none except on the part of the very party that is crying victim. That is why the Task Force was established and why this Interim Report was published….even though the Officer that was supposedly racist was cleared of any wrong-doing. Explain that one.

So, at this point we have an apples-to-apples comparison. Germany’s National Socialist Party (aka Nazi Party) = USA’s Democratic Party. Where did Germany go with the Nazis?

In 1921, the Nazi Party formed the SA (Sturm Abteilung), also known as Stormtroopers (i). These Stormtroopers were recognized as the party militia. In essence, these were community groups who were responsible for carrying out the government’s orders in a strong-arm fashion. They also doubled as spies and turned in anyone not loyal to the Nazi party. Let’s see if Encyclopedia Brittanica’s (j) description of the SA jogs any memories of recent events.

SA men protected Party meetings, marched in Nazi rallies, and physically assaulted political opponents

Let’s see…..sound anything like…oh, I don’t know…maybe….the New Black Panther Party?!

The Southern Poverty Law Center (k) describes the New Black Panther Party as:

The New Black Panther Party is a virulently racist and anti-Semitic organization whose leaders have encouraged violence against whites, Jews and law enforcement officers. Founded in Dallas, the group today is especially active on the East Coast, from Boston to Jacksonville, Fla. The group portrays itself as a militant, modern-day expression of the black power movement

In all fairness, the Black Panthers of the ’60s have denounced the new group and recognize them for the hate-baiters that they are. Still though, does this or does this not sound like Hitler’s SA? And the New Black Panther Party isn’t working alone….in 2008 a voter intimidation case was brought against them for intimidating voters outside of a Philadelphia voting precinct (l). Guess what happened to the case against the Black Panthers? It was thrown out. By who? Eric Holder. Since then, we’ve had race-baiters such as Al Sharpton, Jesse Jackson, and – of course – Eric Holder take center stage. These individuals decry the loss of a black life – even if it was the black’s fault – but stay frighteningly silent when the life lost belonged to a white person. Eric Holder himself helped incite the riots of Ferguson by undermining the decision of the Ferguson courts and launching a federal investigation into Officer Wilson’s behavior. It goes one step beyond that though. The White House, i.e. Obama, sent government representatives to attend Michael Brown’s funeral (m) but failed to send anyone to Major General Harold Greene’s funeral (n). Greene and 15 others were ambushed outside of Kabul….he was the highest ranking military officer to have been lost in combat since Vietnam and not a word from the White House. Considering the topic, it should be noted that Michael Brown was black and Maj. Gen. Greene was white. Go figure.

The other frightening thing to consider is a theme that was repeated frequently in the Interim Report that spawned these blog posts. In each “pillar” it talks about the need to get the community involved in policing efforts. Now, on the surface, this sounds great and I even commented in one of my blog posts that it was a good idea. But then I got to thinking….what if Obama enacted laws that violate my beliefs? What if he took over and made the country totalitarian and I spoke out against him? At that point, my neighbor, the cashier at the grocery store, or even you reading this blog could report me to the authorities and have me arrested. Increased law enforcement is great when the law is fair, but what about when it isn’t? And this president has a track record of not being fair.

So…where are we? Let’s see….Nazis = Democrats. SA/SS = New Black Panther Party/”black power” public figures. Got it. Moving on.

In 1923 Hitler led a revolt that failed and it damaged the Nazi Party’s image greatly (d). He and other Nazi Party leaders were arrested and imprisoned for treason. Hitler was sentenced to five years but was released after 10 months (i). By 1932, the Nazi Party was the biggest political party in Germany. I’m going to stop here for a moment because I’d like to draw a connection between a current event and this piece of history. In a speech last week at a town hall event in Cleveland, Obama said that he would endorse making voting mandatory (f). According to Gallup polls, the Democratic Party is traditionally the larger of the two parties in the country (g). However, it took a big hit in the November elections primarily – according to the Democrats – due to lack of voter turnout. If voting became mandatory – according to Obama – “it would completely change the political map in this country” (f). Check out what else Obama said (q):

“The people who tend not to vote are young, they’re lower income, they’re skewed more heavily towards immigrant groups and minority groups,” Obama said. “They are often the folks who are scratching and climbing to get into the middle-class. They’re working hard.” “There’s a reason why some folks try to keep them away from the polls,” Obama added. He said that making voting compulsory would be a short-term solution. “Long-term I think it would be fun to have a constitutional amendment process about how our financial system works,” he said.

“Fun” and “constitutional” should never be used in the same sentence with one another, especially by someone as lawless as this man.

Democrats prey on voter ignorance. Rather than educate the public about issues, they would prefer to simply tell them how to vote. Congresswoman Corrine Brown of Florida is a great example of this “teach them and they’ll vote for you once; feed them and they’ll vote for you forever” mentality. Congresswoman Brown has made headlines in the past by offering free meals to early voters (o). Now she’s making headlines for handing out mock ballots that tell people how to vote (p). Just like the Nazis. And why would the people vote for anybody else if there’s no one else to vote for?

Hitler became chancellor of the Nazi party in 1933, and the other political parties either dissolved or were suppressed into nonexistence (f). Again, sound familiar? The Tea Party and Constitutional Republicans have been trying to fight the Democrats since Obama came onto the scene and all have been suppressed, though not as successfully as the Democrats would like. Evidence of support for the nation’s Constitution can be seen in Overpasses for America events, Tea Party rallies, the Million Vet March on the Memorials, and a plethora of individual efforts (such as this blog) to spread the truth about the dirty leadership of the Democratic government. Apples-to-apples.

In April of 1933, Hitler introduced the Gestapo, or Nazi secret police, and took over local governments (i). Hmmm….in April 2015 Obama initiated a pilot program of federalizing six police departments (t). More apples-to-apples.

Many things happened in 1933 that set Germany up for Hitler to take control. Some of these things haven’t happened yet for us, but some have. In 1933, trade unions were banned (i). Any political party except the Nazis were banned (i). Germany withdrew from the League of Nations (i). Any media that was “un-German” was banned (i). The “un-German” media is frightening because this is one executive order away from happening now that the FCC controls all forms of media except book publishing.

When Germany’s President Paul von Hindenburg died in 1934 Hitler quickly stepped in and made Germany a totalitarian state with himself as the leader (f). The Nazi party held a vote and overwhelmingly declared Hitler as sole leader of the entire country. This is exactly the kind of take-over that most ‘aware’ citizens are fearing might be coming. The Democratic Party has already shown their unwillingness to work with Republicans and Obama personally has vetoed every bill that has made it to his desk since the Republicans took the majority. He vetoes bills that the American people want passed and then uses executive order to do what he wants. He uses any means necessary to get his way, even if it means lying to a federal judge (h). His actions are those of someone who believes himself to be above the law. That’s a very dangerous mindset to have.

Most people know the history that follows from this point. Hitler’s government cracked down on the rights of anyone not German and eventually 11 million Jews, Christians, Polish citizens, and other nationalities who were unlucky enough to fall within his grasp were murdered (r). It boggles the mind to think that such an atrocity could happen here and our gut reaction is to say that the American people would never be blind enough to let that happen. However, many Germans didn’t know about the atrocities being carried out by their own government in their own country (s).

To prevent non-Jews from attempting to enter the ghettos and from seeing the condition of daily life there for themselves, German authorities posted quarantine signs at the entrances, warning of the danger of contagious disease. Since inadequate sanitation and water supplies coupled with starvation rations quickly undermined the health of the Jews in the ghettos, these warnings became a self-fulfilling prophecy, as typhus and other infectious diseases ravaged ghetto populations. Subsequent Nazi propaganda utilized these man-made epidemics to justify isolating the “filthy” Jews from the larger population.

Remember that the next time you hear a story about a FEMA camp being setup in a mock exercise to control some highly contagious disease from further outbreak.

The bottom line to all of this is that we currently have a government out of control and it is a danger to the citizens of this great country. If you have trouble coming to terms with this then ask yourself this: what would the government have to take over in order to control the people? Now, answer that question.

Education – Common Core.

Media – FCC.

Public health/ Medical care – Obamacare.

Police/public law – ObamaLaw/COPS (Community Oriented Policing Services)

What more does he need to take over before we no longer have the ability to fight back? I didn’t write this to create or spread propaganda. I wrote this to try to bring more people to see the truth. And I hope I’ve succeeded. Please…I urge you. Trust nothing that comes out of D.C. Do your own research. And help spread the truth.

Thanks for reading.

(a) http://www.cops.usdoj.gov/pdf/taskforce/Interim_TF_Report.pdf

(b)  https://realizationsruminationsandlife.wordpress.com/2015/03/03/obamalaw-coming-to-a-police-department-near-you-part-one/

https://realizationsruminationsandlife.wordpress.com/2015/03/04/obamalaw-coming-to-a-police-department-near-you-part-two/

https://realizationsruminationsandlife.wordpress.com/2015/03/08/obamalaw-coming-to-a-police-department-near-you-part-three/

https://realizationsruminationsandlife.wordpress.com/2015/03/13/obamalaw-coming-to-a-police-department-near-you-part-four/

https://realizationsruminationsandlife.wordpress.com/2015/03/18/obamalaw-coming-to-a-police-department-near-you-part-5/

https://realizationsruminationsandlife.wordpress.com/2015/03/20/obamalaw-coming-to-a-police-department-near-you-part-6/

(c) http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/commandingheights/shared/minitext/ess_germanhyperinflation.html

(d) http://history.howstuffworks.com/world-war-ii/national-socialist-german-workers-party.htm

(e) http://www.historyplace.com/worldwar2/riseofhitler/joins.htm

(f) http://allenwestrepublic.com/2015/03/18/obama-calls-for-mandatory-voting-in-u-s/

(g) http://www.gallup.com/poll/15370/party-affiliation.aspx

(h) http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/mar/5/obama-lawyers-misled-federal-judge-in-amnesty-case/?page=all

(i) http://www.historyonthenet.com/chronology/timelinenazigermany.htm

(j) http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/514736/SA

(k) http://www.splcenter.org/get-informed/intelligence-files/groups/new-black-panther-party

(l) http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/07/14/AR2010071405880.html

(m) http://stlouis.cbslocal.com/2014/08/25/obama-sending-white-house-aides-to-attend-michael-browns-funeral/

(n) http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/checkpoint/wp/2014/08/06/obamas-silence-on-death-of-maj-gen-harold-greene-comes-under-fire/

(o) http://jacksonville.com/news/metro/2010-11-01/story/brown-campaign-offers-free-meals-early-voters

(p) http://www.wokv.com/news/news/local/pastor-blames-quick-picks-early-voting-brawl/nkSb6/

(q) http://dailycaller.com/2015/03/19/obama-says-he-would-like-to-make-voting-mandatory-video/

(r) https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/Holocaust/NonJewishVictims.html

(s) http://www.ushmm.org/wlc/en/article.php?ModuleId=10007822

(t) http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/03/12/six-cities-racial-bias-pilot-program_n_6859160.html

ObamaLaw – Coming to a police department near you! – Special: The people of the Task Force

This blog post is going to look specifically at the people that comprise the “ObamaLaw” Task Force. If you have no idea what I’m talking about, I urge you to read the original blog post about this topic so you can get caught up.

In the processing of writing Part Three of my analysis of the Interim Report I did some brief research on the person who was chosen to co-chair the executive-ordered Task Force. The history that I read about Charles Ramsey was terrifying. If you’ve read Part Three of my analysis, you know the danger this man represents. If you haven’t, pay attention. If this man is responsible for overhauling the nation’s law enforcement agencies – and succeeds – the US is going to look like Nazi Germany in no time. I’m glad that I found this information, though, because it alerted me to the fact that we don’t know who these people are, what they’ve done, or what they stand for. It seems to me that if these are the people who are going to shape the future of law enforcement it might behoove us to know their platforms and action history. I’ll be getting my information from a variety of sources and will list them at the conclusion of this post.

According to the Fact Sheet: Task Force on 21st Century Policing (a) released by the White House on December 18, 2014:

The Task Force will be chaired by Philadelphia Police Commissioner Charles H. Ramsey, who also serves as President of the Major Cities Chiefs Police Association, and Laurie Robinson, professor of Criminology, Law and Society at George Mason University and former Assistant Attorney General for DOJ’s Office of Justice Programs.

This is what the Task Force posted a bio for Ramsey:

Charles Ramsey, Appointee for Member and Co-Chair, President’s Task Force on 21st Century Policing
Charles Ramsey is the Commissioner of the Philadelphia Police Department (PPD), a position he has held since 2008.  Since 2010, he has served as President of the Major Cities Chiefs Association and the Police Executive Research Forum.  Commissioner Ramsey began his law enforcement career in 1968 as a cadet with the Chicago Police Department (CPD).  Over the next thirty years, he held various positions with CPD, including Commander of the Narcotics Division, Deputy Chief of the Patrol Division, and Deputy Superintendent, a role he held from 1994 to 1998.  In 1998, he was named Chief of the Metropolitan Police Department of the District of Columbia (MPDC), where he served until early 2007.  In 2007, Commissioner Ramsey served on the Independent Commission on Security Forces of Iraq, leading a review of the Iraqi Police Force.  In addition to his current role at PPD, he also serves as a member of the Homeland Security Advisory Council.  Commissioner Ramsey received a B.S. and M.S. from Lewis University.

This is what the fact sheet didn’t tell you:

In 2008, Charles Ramsey made The Washington Post when his department began doing safety stops and collecting demographic information on the drivers and occasionally even their passengers.(b) This information was then put into a police database. These were people who had committed no crime nor were they suspected of having committed a crime. On September 27, 2002, the police – under Ramsey’s orders – surrounded Pershing Park and arrested over 400 people that were allegedly protesting the World Bank and International Monetary Fund meetings.(c) Many of the people arrested weren’t even protesters but were instead media and pedestrian traffic. The problem with the arrests was that the police had not warned anyone to disperse and had actually prohibited people from leaving the park. Following the arrests, the booking procedures of the detainees included such demeaning things as being told to “strip naked, bend over, and cough”. I strongly urge you to read the full article here for a complete description, including first-hand accounts, of the acts that Ramsey and his force committed. The District of Columbia Court of Appeals ruled on January 13, 2006, that the arrests violated the Fourth Amendment rights of the individuals and that Ramsey could be held personally liable for the violations. Ramsey’s escapades cost the city officials of Washington one million dollars that was paid out to more than 120 of the protesters, not including, not including other settlements reached by the D.C. government (one settlement in excess of $640,000). None of this includes the $1.3 million in legal fees that was paid for Ramsey’s legal representation.

Next on the Fact Sheet’s list is Laurie Robinson. Here’s the bio provided for her:

Laurie Robinson, Appointee for Member and Co-Chair, President’s Task Force on 21st Century Policing
Laurie Robinson is the Clarence J. Robinson Professor of Criminology, Law and Society at George Mason University, a position she has held since 2012.  She served as Assistant Attorney General for the Office of Justice Programs (OJP) in the U.S. Department of Justice from 2009 to 2012.  Prior to that, Ms. Robinson served as the Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General for OJP and Acting Assistant Attorney General for OJP.  Previously, she was a member of the Obama-Biden Transition Team.  From 2003 to 2009, Ms. Robinson was the Director of the Master of Science Program in Criminology at the University of Pennsylvania.  From 1993 to 2000, she served her first term as the Assistant Attorney General for  OJP.  Before joining DOJ, Ms. Robinson spent over twenty years with the American Bar Association, serving as Assistant Staff Director of the Criminal Justice Section from 1972 to 1979, Director of their Criminal Justice Section from 1979 to 1993, and as Director of the Professional Services Division from 1986 to 1993.  She is a Senior Fellow at the George Mason University Center for Evidence-Based Crime Policy, and serves as co-chair of the Research Advisory Committee for the International Association of Chiefs of Police.  She also serves on the Board of Trustees of the Vera Institute of Justice.  Ms. Robinson received a B.A. from Brown University.

Laurie was an interesting one to investigate. Her previous titles and positions read like the who’s who of justice. Being more on he “book” side than the implementation side, she’s never been involved in any altercations or lawsuits. However, if you believe in the old adage of “guilty by association” then she is as sunk as the rest. Laurie served served as assistant attorney general in the Office of Justice Programs (OJP) during the Clinton administrations.(d) One week after obama was brought into office, Laurie began serving as acting assistant attorney general and principal deputy assistant attorney general of OJP. She held these positions until she was nominated to take over the leadership of the office. If you’re like me and prefer to give people the benefit of the doubt, her associations probably aren’t enough to condemn her to scrutiny. Most of what Laurie has represented in the past has been fair and good, but her borderline-liberal views of key topics could be pushed in the realm of liberalism under the current administration. Robinson has been active on boards for organizations that advocated for the rights of illegal immigrants. (e) She believes that there are a disproportionate amount of blacks and Latinos in American jails because the system is biased, not because these populations are committing more crime. Vera, for whom she was a board member from 2001 to 2009, states on their website: “Vera helps officials in criminal and juvenile justice systems to reduce the overrepresentation of racial and ethnic minorities in those systems.” Laurie has also orchestrated several meetings between her professional associates and Attorney General Eric Holder, during which meetings Holder got the ideas for several of his programs.(f) Laurie is a stubborn advocate for what she calls “Justice Reinvestment”, a bipartisan effort through which legislators and policymakers come together to determine how to reallocate resources to both save money and reduce recidivism.(g) Laurie raved about Kentucky legislation which, based on a Justice Reinvestment analysis, reserves prison beds for the most serious offenders and re-focuses resources on community supervision, probation and parole systems, and evidence-based programs. Basically, what they’re saying, is that unless you are an extremely violent individual, you should be allowed to stay in society. Laurie went on to state that Kentucky “is projected to reduce its prison population by more than 3,000 inmates over the next 10 years and save some $422 million as a result of the new law.”. I don’t know about you, but I’m not entirely comfortable with that.

Moving on in the list, next is:

Jose Lopez, Appointee for Member, President’s Task Force on 21st Century Policing
Jose Lopez is currently the Lead Organizer at Make the Road New York (MRNY), a Brooklyn-based non-profit community organization focused on civil rights, education reform, and combating poverty.  He became Lead Organizer of MRNY in 2013.  Mr. Lopez began his career in 2000 as Youth Organizer with Make the Road by Walking, which later merged with the Latin American Integration Center to form MRNY in 2007.  He continued to serve as Youth Organizer with MRNY until 2009, when he became Senior Organizer.  Since 2011, Mr. Lopez has represented MRNY on the steering committee of Communities United for Police Reform, a New York City organization advocating for law enforcement reform.  From 2001 to 2004, he was an active contributor to the Radio Rookies Project, an initiative of New York Public Radio.  He received a B.A. from Hofstra University.

For those of us who are fighting desperately for AMERICAN rights over illegal immigrant rights, this guy’s achievements are a direct slap in the face. MRNY’s facebook page posted this statement on December 14, 2014: “MRNY Lead Organizer Jose Lopez was among the leaders who met with President Obama today to discuss policing. Latinos are a key part of this urgent conversation. Read the ‪#‎FergusonAction‬ statement.” Reading the action statement was about as pleasant as swallowing a mouthful of razor blades. It stated that the Ferguson Action group’s demands included “the federal government using its power to prosecute police officers that kill or abuse people” and “defunding local police departments that use excessive force or racially profile. Instead of having the Department of Justice (DOJ) wholesale giving more than $250 million to local police departments annually, DOJ should only fund departments that agree to adopt DOJ best practices for training and meaningful community input.”. This last line brings up a very interesting choice of wording – “should only fund departments that agree to adopt DOJ best practices”. As a mom who has been fighting Common Core for two years now, I can tell you that this is EXACTLY how the education system was federalized. The federal government tied state funds to accepting Common Core – they could either go the way of the feds or they could go broke. Common Core has turned out to be disastrous, resulting in a plethora of negative results. For example, elementary-aged kids are now being diagnosed with depression and anxiety disorders as a result of high-stakes testing, ADHD diagnoses have skyrocketed as a result of recess being cut out to make room for test prep, and children are actually learning less because they’re only being taught what’s on the test. The other thing about Common Core, is that if you trace the money you will find Pearson Education and other educational companies provided a significant amount of funds to the Obama Administration. I would be willing to bet that if you followed the money for the “best policing practices” it would also lead back to the administration. Jose Lopez’s MRNY is also responsible for stopping deportations through legal intervention and lobbying to change immigration law. According to their website, their 2012 victories include: “launched an immigration law practice serving thousands with Deferred Action applications and hundreds more with deportation defense, permanent lawful status, and immigrant services fraud prevention”; “mobilized 20,000 new voters on Election Day as part of our new Campaign for Respect & Dignity, after registering 12,000 voters of color in NYC and Long Island and, with the Center for Popular Democracy, an additional 7,000 in Pennsylvania”. Folks, if that doesn’t scare you I don’t know what will.

There are eight more Task Force members that I’m going to save for later posts (4 tomorrow, last 4 Tuesday) since this post is already so long. The members so far – a known Constitutional rights violator (Ramsey), a prisoner rights advocate (Robinson), and an illegals-before-Americans advocate – are proving to be fairly impressive…..if you live in a communist country. Wake up, America, and look at the areas of federal over-reach. Health care, education, internet, and now our police departments. These are key areas that have to be taken if you’re planning to overthrow a nation’s system of government and take control of its people. It’s not too late, but we have to get this under control. Contact your legislators, your representatives, your Congressmen, your police chiefs….and don’t stop contacting them until they begin to hear us.

(a)  http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2014/12/18/fact-sheet-task-force-21st-century-policing

(b) http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/05/01/AR2005050100848_pf.html

(c)  http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/articles/25398/boss-hogtie

(d) http://www.allgov.com/news/appointments-and-resignations/office-of-justice-programs-who-is-laurie-robinson?news=841747

(e) http://www.vera.org

(f) http://nij.ncjrs.gov/multimedia/video-nijconf2010-opening-robinson.htm

(g) http://www.justice.gov/opa/speech/assistant-attorney-general-laurie-o-robinson-speaks-international-community-corrections

(h) http://fergusonaction.com/white-house-meeting/

Time for a little peaceful revolution……..

My dad always said if you didn’t like something then either fix it or shut up complaining about it. Unfortunately, I can’t just “fix” our government – believe me, I wish I could.

However, WE the PEOPLE do have tools that we can use to remind the politicians who pays their paychecks. I’m suggesting we utilize one of the best methods of getting Big Brother’s attention….a strike. Please check out the FB group 9/11 Liberty Strike and join the revolution!

9/11 Liberty Strike FB Group 

Difference between “immigrate” and “invade”…..

Let’s take a look at immigration….

im·mi·grate

verb \ˈi-mə-ˌgrāt\

: to come to a country to live there;

intransitive verb
:  to enter and usually become established (see definition below); especially :  to come into a country of which one is not a native for permanent residence
Established……what does that mean?

verb \i-ˈsta-blish\

: to cause (someone or something) to be widely known and accepted

: to put (someone or something) in a position, role, etc., that will last for a long time

: to begin or create (something that is meant to last for a long time)

 

Oh, I see…..so to immigrate it is to move to a new country and be accepted by them, like getting permission to enter. I get it.

Now, let’s look at this word:

in·vade

verb \in-ˈvād\

: to enter (a place, such as a foreign country) in order to take control by military force

: to enter (a place) in large numbers

: to enter or be in (a place where you are not wanted)

By these very definitions, our country is being invaded and our government is doing NOTHING! Call your representatives, send emails, and – if necessary – be prepared to defend our borders. Contact your local Oathkeepers, 2 Million Bikers to DC, Overpasses for America, or other liberty-defending group and find out how you can become involved.

Remember, amnesty is for people who follow the law. Illegal immigrants are trespassing and breaking the law. One is a future citizen, the other is a criminal. NO AMNESTY FOR ILLEGALS!